找回密码
 注册
搜索
查看: 723|回复: 2

[讨论] 大家谈下AAPL吧

[复制链接]
发表于 2010-7-1 12:47 AM | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式


最近股市下跌, 苹果也跟着跌, 都下了50天均线了, 不过消息面上, 苹果产品热卖, iPhone 4, iPAD, 都大卖, 那么这个ER季节会不会 很好?
那可以买点苹果了吗?
发表于 2010-7-1 03:06 AM | 显示全部楼层
Apple Inc. was sued over reception problems with its new iPhone 4 by consumers who accused the company of unfair business practices and false and misleading advertising.

A New Jersey resident and a Massachusetts resident who had bought the new mobile phone filed separate complaints yesterday in federal court in San Francisco, each seeking to represent other iPhone buyers in a class action, or group, lawsuit.

The June 24 introduction of the iPhone 4 was marred by criticism that signal strength diminishes when users cover the bottom left corner of the phone with their palm. The iPhone, which debuted in 2007, has become Apple’s top-selling product even after users reported glitches and dropped calls with previous versions of the device.

“Apple’s sale of the iPhone with this unannounced defect, assuming Apple’s prior knowledge of the defect, constitutes misrepresentation and fraud,” Christopher Dydyk of Cambridge, Massachusetts, said in his complaint. “In omitting to disclose the defect in the iPhone 4, Apple perpetrated a massive fraud upon hundreds of thousands of unsuspecting customers.”

Apple, which sold more than 1.7 million of the new phones in its first three days, has recommended users hold the phone differently or use a case to solve the problem. Apple is selling its own iPhone 4 cases in six colors for $29 each. They’re made of a piece of rubber known as a “bumper,” which surrounds the outer rim of the phone.

Dydyk, in his complaint, asked that Apple ship a bumper for free to customers who pre-ordered an iPhone 4 before its release or that the company be ordered to pay for customers’ bumpers.

Natalie Harrison, a spokeswoman for Cupertino, California, based Apple, didn’t immediately return a call to her office or respond to an e-mailed request for comment after regular business hours.

The cases are Alan Benvenisty v. Apple, 10-2885, and Christopher Dydyk v. Apple, 10-2897, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California (San Francisco).
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 2010-7-1 04:23 AM | 显示全部楼层
有没有哪位老大从TA的角度分析一下呢?
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

手机版|小黑屋|www.hutong9.net

GMT-5, 2024-5-4 03:31 PM , Processed in 0.029865 second(s), 14 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.5

© 2001-2024 Discuz! Team.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表